I recently had a choice to either nurture a new idea or kill it. The opportunity came by way of an old, expired offer to purchase an REO in Scotch Plains, NJ. The deal was "dead", yet long after the clearly stated expiration date the listing agent called. He informed us that we could but the house for our originally offered price of $236,000. At the time of the offer, in May, the asking price was over $345,000. Why was the old, dead offer resurrected? What changed? An alarm when off in my gut. The agent informed us that the new asking price was $200,000. Why did he think we would now pay $236,000? The agent added, almost in passing, that the previous buyer backed out because the house needed over $50,000 in work; BUT houses in that area have sold for over $600,000! When I asked for comps to back up the $600,000 claim he quickly backed off on that number. Now, why would a fairly new house built in 2005 need that much work? Surely it was poorly constructed in the first place.
But, eager to move the deal forward I emailed a potential end-buyer/rehabber
So how did this once dead, now resurrected deal end up "mutilated"? Turns out that the repair costs were over $100,000, not $50,000. Basically the cost to build the house in the first place. So this deal would be better handled as a tear-down; offer the value of the land minus demolition and other costs. Since there are few looking to do new construction